View Single Post

  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2007, 12:31 PM
SusanMae SusanMae is offline
Moderator and CPS Tech (T623811)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 167
SusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant futureSusanMae has a brilliant future
Default

If seatbelts next to one another were truely a concern...we wouldn't have 3 belts in the back. It may happen...but if it happened on any kind of regular basis---they wouldn't be doing anymore. There would be a public out cry and gov't intervention.

I don't know where you live...but I can get news from both the Wash, DC area and the Balitmore, MD area---and I don't think I've ever heard a story of the carseat with child in it being ejected and the child being fine. And I'm apart of the listserve---haven't ready any of those stories on there either.

Where is that study on the failure rate of LATCH vs Seatbelt? I'd love to read it. Everything that I've been taught as a CPST is that both LATCH and the Seatbelt are equally safe and to use the one that gives you the BEST install. One is NOT safer than the other. I imagine failures come in when people are using either system incorrectly--and well that's not a failure of the system...that's misuse.

I know I've read along the lines that the seatbelt is designed for a nearly 6', 200 pound male. I'm 5'2" and I have a problem with seatbelts fitting me properly in some situations. Unfortunatly they don't make a booster for me.

And an overhead sheild is considered a 5 pt...but the points are in different locations, and you're risking your childs face smacking a hard plastic bar in a crash.

Susan, CPST
Reply With Quote